The so-called Equality Act was first introduced in 2015 and has been reintroduced in every subsequent session of Congress. It was most recently reintroduced in both the House and the Senate on April 29, 2025. If it passes, it will be a disaster for women’s sex-based rights. Thankfully, WDI USA does not think it is likely to advance in either chamber.
However, WDI USA has an alternative to propose, which would be good for women’s sex-based rights, and ought to have a chance of getting bipartisan support. It’s called the Equality for All Act.
The so-called Equality Act would add “gender identity” to the protected characteristics in civil rights law in a way that would completely erase the existing sex-based rights of women and girls by conflating sex and “gender identity.” Furthermore, while purporting to add sexual orientation to the list of protected characteristics, a move that WDI USA would support, the Act actually erases the very meaning of sexual orientation by conflating sex and “gender identity.”
“Gender” is nothing more than sex stereotypes that enforce dominance in men and submissiveness in women. Individuals who do not conform to sex stereotypes face discrimination that requires protection. But instead of supporting abolition of these enforced stereotypes, the “Equality Act” would actually reinforce them and enshrine them in law.
In contrast, our proposed Equality for All Act (EFAA) would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and nonconformity to sex-based stereotypes, while maintaining the existing sex-based protections for women and girls. WDI USA hopes that a member of Congress will consider introducing the EFAA as an alternative to the current version of the Equality Act.
The EFAA would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, and nonconformity to sex-based stereotypes by:
- completely eliminating the term “gender identity” from the document and replacing it with “nonconformity to sex-based stereotypes;”
- adding the words “of a female person” to follow the phrase “… or on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition” wherever it appears in the original document;
- removing any references to “transgender” or “queer”, while maintaining references to lesbian, gay, and bisexual persons;
- replacing the phrase “sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity)” with “sex, sexual orientation, and nonconformity to sex-based stereotypes” wherever it appears in the original document, as we feel strongly that ‘sex’, ‘sexual orientation’ and ‘nonconformity to sex-based stereotypes’ should all stand alone as equally protected characteristics as opposed to as qualifiers; and by
- providing clear, non-circular definitions for any terms the document references.
